I just finished reading a
book about Nora Ephron. It was by “her best friend” and it made me grateful
that most of my closest friends are not
writers.
Nora Ephron was, to me,
one of those women like Wendy Wasserstein, whom we don’t know personally and
yet feel we know. We feel they know us, too, and we are certain we and they
would be meeting regularly for lunch or trading recipes or book recommendations
or names of hairdressers…if only we had ever met.
Or maybe not. The Nora in
this book isn’t really the girlfriend with the crepey neck or the not-so-much
bosom buddy. She isn’t the relatably imperfect Meg Ryan characters in the
movies that touched us—she was, instead, the frighteningly accomplished
director creating the films anddon’tyouforgetit. She was the uber-connected
person who always knew how to do or where to buy everything, cook like a
four-star chef, and charm everyone in sight. She was also apparently
overbearing, intimidating, and not
inclined to let kindness get in the way of making a witty or brutally honest comment.
I felt relieved to have never had her personally in my life. Just reading about
her left me in despair at the puniness of my life and in need of major
validation. She would not have been my girlfriend: she would not have noticed
my existence.
And no reason she would
have. And no reason to admire her enormous and pleasure-giving achievements any
less.
But all these more human
qualities laid out in print by the “best friend” gave me pause. The book did
not really offer a glimpse into the friendship. I had no insight into the
comfort they may have offered each other in the wake of dissolved marriages or advice they
may have shared on nurturing children or careers. The whole fact of the
friendship was, as they say in writing workshops, told not shown. But shown,
though I am guessing unconsciously, was the writer’s small nastiness and glee
at exposing Nora’s flaws.
And while I was reading
this, I also happened to read a magazine essay so shocking in its ugliness that
it was, like an unfolding accident, impossible to tear my eyes from. The author
was “celebrating” her mother’s 75th birthday by presenting her with
the harsh evidence of a traumatic family event both had stayed silent about for
decades. In the course of the essay, small ungenerous details, clearly added in
hostility, made the reader feel sympathy for the mother instead of for the
author, as was very obviously intended.
We writers are always
writing about other people for a variety of reasons. They are our own reasons
and it might be useful for us to remember that what the reader takes in often
says a bit about us, too.
-->
Post a Comment